Viewing 1 to 18 (18 Total) Marlcliff further habitat destruction |
|
---|---|
AndyBTotal Posts: 4
Joined: January 5, 2017
|
Following on from the destruction of the bankside and illegal raising of the weir the farmer has completely destroyed the far bank trees and vegetation that made this stretch not only a lovely place to fish but a perfect habitat on a river those who have fished for any length of time will verify as being a shadow of it's former self. I'm horrified that someone could do this to the environment and be the master over so much of it. EA are looking into it but I don't hold out much hope despite the fact that this work should never have been carried out between March and August due to nesting birds.
Tags:
Posted on April 6, 2020 at 8:15 PM
|
wagandmagTotal Posts: 6
Joined: July 19, 2019
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionThey grow back.It stops them from growing so big that they become top heavy and collapse.
Posted on April 12, 2020 at 9:14 PM
|
binTotal Posts: 270
Joined: August 1, 2018
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionI understand the concept of polard trees......but cutting them down is another matter..
Posted on April 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM
|
wagandmagTotal Posts: 6
Joined: July 19, 2019
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionCome back in 12 months.
Posted on April 13, 2020 at 11:43 AM
|
binTotal Posts: 270
Joined: August 1, 2018
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionI will ...but that’s 12 months away........
Posted on April 13, 2020 at 2:41 PM
|
wagandmagTotal Posts: 6
Joined: July 19, 2019
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionThe stumps remain, out of which, new growth will sprout (see photo). Thus spoke the Lord. OK, so I made the last bit up, but you get the idea. Or have I been playing with 'Photoshop'?
Attachments:
Photo1123.jpg
Posted on April 14, 2020 at 11:34 AM
|
LeeTotal Posts: 86
Joined: June 8, 2015
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionIn an era where predation seems to be at its peak, taking away vital cover means that fish stocks will be massively vulnerable. I suspect that the cover won't be the same in 12 months time. What is frustrating is that 'things' seem to happen on BAA stretches and nothing ever seems to be done and no engagement made.
Posted on April 15, 2020 at 9:33 PM
|
HornetTotal Posts: 108
Joined: June 23, 2015
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionWell said Lee.
Posted on April 16, 2020 at 9:38 AM
|
stew83mulTotal Posts: 663
Joined: May 30, 2015
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionExactly the same right up the Staffs-Worc canal,CRT dredged the bottom and cut off all overhanging trees and bushes and ruined some cracking pegs.Not only does it give the fish no shelter it ruins nesting spots for a lot of birds too.Seems all they care about is the boaters.
Posted on April 16, 2020 at 3:18 PM
|
binTotal Posts: 270
Joined: August 1, 2018
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionWag and mag.....no mate I don’t think you’ve been using photoshop, if you was I think you could of came up with a much better example than that 3 foot bush.....hardly a great justification of the devastation up at marcliff...no way will them trees have grown back to the standard they were before in 12 months , by which time the fish stocks will have been devoured or just move on to better shelter. The bottom line is your looking at at least 5 years before this venue will recover to its former glory , if ever ?...in the last 40 years if seen this many times on many venues both baa and other association waters up and down the country.....I will go back in 12 months and I will upload some photos and then we will see......
Posted on April 22, 2020 at 10:58 AM
|
CragTotal Posts: 75
Joined: August 27, 2015
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionThe thing is with willows if you don't cut them right back, you find yourself having to cut them again soon after
Posted on April 23, 2020 at 6:02 AM
|
AndyBTotal Posts: 4
Joined: January 5, 2017
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionI cannot believe that any angler would even try and condone this habitat destruction! Lets see what the implications are;
Attachments:
IMG_2059.JPG
IMG_1308.JPG
Posted on April 23, 2020 at 2:03 PM
|
binTotal Posts: 270
Joined: August 1, 2018
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionWell I think that’s puts the lid on this discussion.....12 months my arse....
Posted on April 24, 2020 at 10:22 AM
|
wagandmagTotal Posts: 6
Joined: July 19, 2019
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionThis (photo) might prompt a few bites.
Attachments:
Photo0008.jpg
Posted on May 5, 2020 at 10:39 AM
|
stew83mulTotal Posts: 663
Joined: May 30, 2015
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionWagandmag is that photo from just above the car park at Barton?If it is I reported it to the fisheries team when I was there before the floods but obviously all work has had to be put on hold at the moment.
Posted on May 5, 2020 at 12:56 PM
|
stew83mulTotal Posts: 663
Joined: May 30, 2015
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionObviously needs removing because it’s ruined two pegs.Think this a different situation to further downstream though as discussed above.
Posted on May 5, 2020 at 12:58 PM
|
AndyBTotal Posts: 4
Joined: January 5, 2017
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionSo wagandmag, are you saying all trees should be removed as they might come down or otherwise get in your way? I cannot believe any angler would condone this destruction.
Posted on May 5, 2020 at 5:22 PM
|
binTotal Posts: 270
Joined: August 1, 2018
|
Re: Marlcliff further habitat destructionLads we all know this destructive works are wrong but it’s no good arguing with him . Once he realised he was wrong he turns into one of them childish keyboard warriors and starts typing insults just to get a reaction....well you all know type of child we’re dealing with...
Posted on May 7, 2020 at 7:16 PM
|