Viewing 1 to 16 (16 Total) Naming pegs/forum rules |
|
---|---|
PeachyTotal Posts: 46
Joined: January 24, 2019
|
I have been reading through some of the older posts, and note that some mention certain pegs should not be named or described. This apparently is part of the forum rules, but I cannot find anything to substantiate this.
Tags:
Posted on February 16, 2020 at 6:24 PM
|
stew83mulTotal Posts: 663
Joined: May 30, 2015
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesPeachy you’re right,there is no rules on here about naming pegs.It does seem to be an issue that only so called “Barbel anglers “ seem to kick up a fuss about.While I can see the reasons as to why some of them feel this way I think it’s wrong to attack someone for simply pointing a fellow member in the right direction to hopefully get them a few fish.Also I think in one person’s case it’s not the worry of angling pressure potentially ruining a stretch,it’s simply because they want it all to them self!
Posted on February 16, 2020 at 6:36 PM
|
Johnny_CareTotal Posts: 407
Joined: June 10, 2015
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesPeachy - I don't think it's part of any rules as such, and to answer your question, I'd say it's a "barbel thing" if I'm honest. I know it gets up some people's noses, and I can understand why really. I did suggest in a different thread last week about etiquette amongst barbel anglers, but at the end of the day it's up to individuals.
Posted on February 16, 2020 at 6:37 PM
|
PeachyTotal Posts: 46
Joined: January 24, 2019
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesThanks guys.
Posted on February 16, 2020 at 7:15 PM
|
onelastcastTotal Posts: 820
Joined: July 4, 2015
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesAs John says it really does no one any good at all pinpointing where a good Barbel was caught, especially for the barbel or for any other species given the sudden influx of anglers and feed. Probably not so important on rivers such as the Severn, Trent etc, but smaller rivers such as the Warks Avon it is. The on going campaign in pinpointing a particular stretch by a member on here was as the member admitted was to wind me up...all that this serves to do is make Barbel more cautious move or just die.
Posted on February 17, 2020 at 6:36 PM
|
RiverNoviceTotal Posts: 373
Joined: August 21, 2018
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesHere we go again ? Some one has felt the need to climb again in to his pulpit and start preaching to us all ? Turns out I've not broken any rules then by naming stretches ?
Posted on February 18, 2020 at 10:53 AM
|
Johnny_CareTotal Posts: 407
Joined: June 10, 2015
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesHere we go again ? Some one has felt the need to climb again in to his pulpit and start preaching to us all ? Turns out I've not broken any rules then by naming stretches ? Christ, give it a rest. You posted this morning, and Neil didn't respond, and now you've returned and edited your post with an extra sentence to have a dig at Neil's age. Grow up man.
Posted on February 18, 2020 at 3:29 PM
|
onelastcastTotal Posts: 820
Joined: July 4, 2015
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesGod its the nause again, of course there are no rules about naming stretches, there are unwritten rules regarding etiquette of how we respect each other. You freely admit to encourage others to do your dirty work by packing a stretch that produced a good fish. Some clubs operate a no publicity rule to protect primarily the fish, I don't think that would ever be the way BAA should operate because of the diverse angling disciplines.
Posted on February 18, 2020 at 3:32 PM
|
DAZTotal Posts: 6
Joined: September 1, 2018
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesHi All.
Posted on February 18, 2020 at 8:16 PM
|
stew83mulTotal Posts: 663
Joined: May 30, 2015
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesThat’s what it’s all about Daz,any time I’m out bailiffing or someone contacts me asking where they can go to get a few fish I always point them in the right direction to somewhere they will get a few fish.I get that people don’t want the circus that can follow news of a big fish being caught but I think it’s pretty obvious that with some people it’s purely out of selfishness and they want a peg they’ve had success off all to themselves
Posted on February 18, 2020 at 11:17 PM
|
onelastcastTotal Posts: 820
Joined: July 4, 2015
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesMore nonsense from you, you twist the truth, read what is said, the Barbel always are the priority not the me angler, but just a desire to ensure we still have these fish in years to come. By SENSIBLE management that could happen. Your ideas are very much at odds with virtually the whole angling community, but that doesnt surprise me one bit. BAA would be much poorer without these fish, it would make sense to appreciate the extra revenue Barbel anglers bring, it really does seem you resent this group.
Posted on February 19, 2020 at 1:47 AM
|
ShmuckTotal Posts: 24
Joined: October 24, 2017
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesOnelastcast should re-name himself onelastword cos he always has it!
Posted on February 19, 2020 at 11:08 AM
|
RickbTotal Posts: 60
Joined: February 16, 2019
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesJust to note, I can see Peachy made reference to myself as in info sent, I have been a member for over 40 years, but I tend to fish instead of type.
Posted on February 19, 2020 at 12:20 PM
|
stew83mulTotal Posts: 663
Joined: May 30, 2015
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesJesus Neil you don’t half talk some sh*t!I think you need to alter your medication old chap.So now “my ideas are at odds with virtually the whole angling community” ha ha ha ha,what the hell are you on about?What ideas are these?Because I said I like to help other members get a few fish?Do everyone a favour and make it onelastpost or go and have a lie down.
Posted on February 19, 2020 at 12:22 PM
|
RiverNoviceTotal Posts: 373
Joined: August 21, 2018
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesStew what other response do you expect from Neil when you try and help some one ? and he suggests I have problems ?
Posted on February 19, 2020 at 3:12 PM
|
stew83mulTotal Posts: 663
Joined: May 30, 2015
|
Re: Naming pegs/forum rulesExactly!How can you waffle on about keeping stretches secret or exclusively for himself more like,and pressure on big fish getting repeatedly caught then in the next sentence admit to catching the same 15lber as John did several times?Slightly hypocritical don’t you think?
Posted on February 19, 2020 at 3:41 PM
|